![]() Both AMD cards sell for $120-$130, so they're less expensive than the 750 Ti, but not by much. To benchmark the 750 Ti's performance I d it off against AMD's R7 260X and a Sapphire HD 7790 OC. Noise was no problem when I overclocked the card, and it wasn't noticeably louder than when it was stock clocked. I overclocked the 750 Ti by modestly increasing its boost clock to 1169MHz, using EVGA's Precision X overclocking tool.ĭoing so created no detectable stability issues, and provided a performance increase of about 5% across all games, with the exception of Batman: Arkham Origins which only received a 3% boost in performance. If you're going to run multiple monitors I'd push you toward this 2GB Ti version, as you'll have more video RAM bandwidth for doing things across your displays. It's worth mentioning a non-Ti version will come soon and sport 1GB of RAM and retail for $119/£90. The 750 Ti comes with 2GB of GDDR5 video RAM clocked at 5400MHz, too. The card features 512 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1020MHz, and a boost clock of 1085MHz. When it comes to specs this entry-level 700-Series card doesn't disappoint. That, combined with its small size, makes it an easy upgrade for a wide swath of systems. ![]() Nvidia's PSU requirement for the 750 Ti is also low at just 300W, so you won't need a beefy 500W or 750W beast to power this mini GPU. In contrast, AMD's R7 260X eats up almost double the wattage with its 115W TDP. The 750 Ti is a power-efficient video card that consumes a mere 60W.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |